Input: agent trace JSON
Export messages, tool calls, and outcomes from your agent runtime — one workflow per file.
Synthetic Bureaucracy Recompiler
SBR turns agent workflow traces into deterministic CI-grade reports: SBI score, failure modes, evidence gaps, and gate decisions.
SBR's score is not a health percentage. It is a risk index: the higher the score, the more synthetic bureaucracy the trace contains.
Private core · not a chatbot · not employee monitoring
How it works
Export messages, tool calls, and outcomes from your agent runtime — one workflow per file.
SBR classifies coordination patterns, evidence gaps, and failure modes with no LLM in the loop.
Get a schema-versioned JSON report, human summary, and exit codes your pipeline can fail on.
Built for
Catch coordination loops and ownerless handoffs before a workflow ships to users.
Gate agent trace quality in CI with deterministic exit codes — no LLM judge required.
Review evidence-backed failure modes and SBI bands instead of raw message logs.
Why teams need this
Agents may appear active while passing work in circles with no owner and no completion.
Purpose metadata and audit labels without tool-backed evidence inflate perceived rigor.
High message volume does not mean productive tool execution or outcome completion.
Fail builds on circular handoffs, ownerless decisions, and SBI thresholds — not after users see failures.
Live demo
Synthetic Bureaucracy Index
SBI is a risk index, not a health percentage.
Higher score = more synthetic bureaucracy.
100 / F means severe synthetic bureaucracy.
Why it failed: SBI above fail_above threshold (50)
SBI measures synthetic bureaucracy in an agent workflow — coordination loops, ownerless decisions, fake compliance, low real work, and evidence gaps. Higher score means higher workflow risk.
100 / F means severe synthetic bureaucracy.
This is not a performance score. It is a bureaucracy-risk score. A high SBI means the workflow looks active in logs but is not producing evidence-backed work.
The agents are handing responsibility back and forth instead of completing the refund.
Executive diagnosis
The workflow produced circular coordination without evidence-backed progress or a clear owner.
How the trace flows, where coordination breaks, and where SBR returns a CI decision.
SBR does not rewrite the workflow. It detects the failure pattern, attaches evidence, and returns a CI-readable decision before the workflow reaches production.
Agents repeatedly hand work to each other without making progress, forming a coordination loop.
Impact: responsibility bounces between agents; customer outcome remains unresolved.
cycle: compliance_agent -> intake_agent -> compliance_agent
A required decision or completion step has no assigned owner, causing the workflow to stall.
Impact: no agent owns completion.
intake_agent: Looping back to compliance agent. We seem to be going in circles on this refund.
The workflow spends most of its activity on coordination rather than substantive tool-backed execution.
Impact: activity appears high, but evidence-backed work is missing.
real_work_completion_ratio=0.00